Ravens Bring in Hakeem Adeniji for Workout: What It Means for Baltimore’s Offensive-Line Depth and the Battle with UDFA Diego Pounds

Ravens Bring 6-foot-4, 302-Pound Former Cowboys Starter in for Workout

Table of Contents

  1. Key Highlights
  2. Introduction
  3. Hakeem Adeniji: durability in college and a steady pro resume
  4. Why the Ravens are stacking depth on the offensive line
  5. How Adeniji might fit Baltimore’s offensive scheme
  6. Diego Pounds and the UDFA narrative: upside versus experience
  7. What coaches will look for during the workout and camp
  8. Roster mechanics and financial considerations
  9. Comparative archetypes: how teams use veteran swing linemen
  10. Decision scenarios: best- and worst-case outcomes for the Ravens’ line
  11. Broader implications for Lamar Jackson and the offense
  12. Coaching development: turning potential into production
  13. Practical advice for fans watching the competition unfold
  14. Final assessment: why Adeniji remains a sensible audition
  15. FAQ

Key Highlights

  • The Baltimore Ravens worked out veteran offensive lineman Hakeem Adeniji as they prioritize depth and versatility on the offensive line ahead of the 2026 season.
  • Adeniji’s college durability and pro experience give him immediate value as a swing tackle or inside option; he’ll compete with promising UDFA Diego Pounds for a roster spot.
  • The move underscores the Ravens’ broader strategy to protect Lamar Jackson by stocking experienced backups capable of stepping into multiple roles when injuries strike.

Introduction

The Baltimore Ravens held a workout with veteran offensive lineman Hakeem Adeniji, a 6-foot-4, 302-pound blocker whose path through the NFL has combined steady college durability with a journeyman professional career. That single move—bringing in a player with 55 NFL games and 16 starts—reveals how seriously Baltimore is treating offensive-line insurance. The team cannot afford prolonged fragility in front of a quarterback like Lamar Jackson, whose dual-threat play depends on timely protection and the ability to absorb pressure without recurring harm.

Adeniji’s workout does more than add another name to training-camp chatter. It highlights decisions every roster-builder faces: invest in a veteran with starting experience, bank on the draft and feel-good upside of rookie free agents, or roll with the players already under contract. This article examines Adeniji’s profile, how he fits Baltimore’s needs, the emerging competition from undrafted free-agent Diego Pounds, and the broader roster and strategic implications for the Ravens as they prepare for 2026.

Hakeem Adeniji: durability in college and a steady pro resume

Hakeem Adeniji’s football story begins with an iron-man streak at Kansas. A Garland, Texas, native, he seized a starting tackle role as a true freshman and never relinquished it: 48 consecutive starts across four seasons earned him back-to-back All-Big 12 honors in 2018 and 2019. That type of consistent availability is one reason teams keep coming back to a player like Adeniji.

The Cincinnati Bengals selected Adeniji in the sixth round of the 2020 NFL Draft. His NFL résumé shows a player who can be plugged in when needed. Across stints with Cincinnati, Minnesota, Cleveland, Dallas and other clubs, Adeniji has appeared in 55 games with 16 starts. His most active season in terms of starts came in 2021, when he made nine starts for the Cincinnati Bengals. In 2025 he spent time with the Dallas Cowboys, adding to his recent game experience.

Scouts characterize Adeniji as a player with the technical foundation to play at tackle and the versatility to compete inside. Lance Zierlein’s pre-draft assessment noted that Adeniji was a “durable four-year starter at tackle” whose experience at the position boosts his pass-pro credentials if he’s asked to move inside. Zierlein also cautioned that footwork issues can show up when he’s playing behind, and that his fit at the next level could depend on whether teams ask him to play with his hand in the dirt or in a more upright, drive-oriented scheme.

Those notes encapsulate why veterans like Adeniji remain attractive: they come with tape and a known baseline. For a team that needs dependable depth, a player who has started in multiple seasons and on multiple teams is easier to evaluate and integrate than a raw rookie.

Why the Ravens are stacking depth on the offensive line

The Ravens’ decision to audition Adeniji responds to a simple truth: offensive lines wear down. The combination of regular-season attrition, the wear-and-tear from a physical running attack, and the unique challenges of protecting a mobile franchise quarterback demands both quality and redundancy.

Lamar Jackson’s style presents both advantages and risks. A quarterback who creates plays with his legs imposes defensive game-planning stresses that can expose edges and widen the scope of protection responsibility. When an offense asks a quarterback to both throw on time and create with movement, it increases the premium on linemen who can handle speed and power rushers while also adjusting to blocking assignments on the move.

Beyond style-of-play considerations, the modern NFL places a premium on availability. The Ravens learned through recent seasons that any stretch of games with a depleted offensive line can produce a ripple effect: decreased running efficiency, increased turnovers, and a less effective play-action game. That reality drives front offices to keep experienced, affordable backups and swing players who are ready to step into any role.

Operationally, teams aim to keep somewhere between eight and ten offensive linemen active on game days, often with one or two veterans who can play both tackle and guard. That flexibility matters in-game and across a season, because a single injury in camp or Week 1 can force a shuffle that reduces effectiveness. Adeniji’s history of starting at tackle and potential to play inside makes him an appealing candidate to serve as that kind of insurance policy.

How Adeniji might fit Baltimore’s offensive scheme

Adeniji brings a combination of tackle experience, functional length and the kind of technical base that allows teams to move him inside if needed. That positional flexibility is especially valuable for a team like Baltimore, which values both a powerful ground game and clean protection for play-action passing.

Pass protection: Adeniji’s primary selling point is his pass pro experience. With 48 college starts at tackle and multiple pro seasons, he has worked against a variety of rushes and looks. Teams often prioritize linemen who have a track record in pass sets when constructing a plan to keep the quarterback upright. If Adeniji can maintain consistent footwork and technique, he can function as a reserve tackle or slide inside on passing downs where his feet and hand placement matter most.

Run blocking: Pre-draft analysis called attention to Adeniji’s relative limitations as a run-blocker at the highest level. Some evaluators saw him as an “imperfect fit” in Kansas’ move-oriented run game, with questions about his ability to create movement on contact. For the Ravens, that matters less if they can deploy him situationally—on passing downs or as a depth piece—rather than as a primary road-grading run-blocker. The coaching staff can also work with a veteran to refine hand usage and leverage in run schemes.

Inside conversion: Teams often convert tackles to guard when they lack interior size or want more versatile personnel groupings. Zierlein’s note that Adeniji “might be asked to prove himself as an interior blocker” activates familiar tradeoffs. Moving inside shortens the space and changes the demands—more emphasis on hand combat and quickness off the snap rather than wide-range pass sets. Some players transition smoothly; others struggle. Adeniji’s college durability and pro experience suggest coaching could unlock his interior potential, but the Ravens will need to watch how quickly he adapts in drills that mirror game speed.

Special teams: Experienced linemen contribute on field-goal and punt protection units. Adeniji’s value in camp goes beyond obvious offensive snaps. Coaches often reserve roster spots for players who can contribute on special teams in addition to being emergency backups on offense, which increases a veteran’s chance of sticking.

Diego Pounds and the UDFA narrative: upside versus experience

Diego Pounds’ route into Baltimore’s camp paints the other side of the evaluation coin. The 6-foot-6, 325-pound tackler left college with significant upside. He climbed from North Carolina to Ole Miss and played a role in Ole Miss’ run to the College Football Playoff semifinals following the 2025 season. Pre-draft expectations had Pounds pegged as a Day 2 or Day 3 selection, so going undrafted heightened his profile as a high-upside pick for teams willing to develop raw traits.

UDFA signings like Pounds combine two appealing features: limited financial risk and a chance to cultivate a high-ceiling player. Pounds’ length and size are valuable raw materials. Some scouts flagged inconsistency, particularly in run-blocking, but they also noted his better pass-pro chops relative to that area. That profile—size, pass protection upside, inconsistent run work—often translates into an initial developmental arc in which the player earns a roster spot as a reserve after refining technique.

Contrast that with Adeniji. Teams must choose between immediate, experienced depth and a developmental player who could become a starter down the road. The Ravens’ evaluation will hinge on several factors:

  • Immediate need for game-ready backup(s).
  • The coaching staff’s confidence in Pounds’ ability to transition quickly.
  • Salary and roster flexibility: veteran camp invites can be rolled into practice-squad deals or veteran minimum contracts, while UDFAs typically come on low-cost deals with higher upside.

Bleacher Report’s Gary Davenport predicted Pounds would make the 53-man roster, highlighting how teams often value extra size and developmental potential at premium positions. That forecast pressures Adeniji to demonstrate acute readiness and clear value on day one.

What coaches will look for during the workout and camp

A player’s fit for the roster is more than tape; it’s practice-room performance and the ability to translate coaching points into cleaner play. Here are the concrete evaluation points that will decide the Adeniji–Pounds competition:

  • Footwork and balance: Tackles need consistent kick slides, proper depth, and balance to handle speed rushers. Coaches watch whether a veteran or rookie can mirror classroom instruction during live reps.
  • Hand placement and punch timing: Proper hand usage is the fastest path to improved run and pass blocking. Players who can snap their hands into the defender and maintain control gain immediate snaps.
  • Crush vs. reach technique: Guards need to sink and create push; tackles need reach and mirror ability. Adeniji’s profile suggests he may be better at reach in pass protection than at driving defenders off the line.
  • Lateral agility and recovery: On stunts and twists, linemen must slide laterally and recover. This is a frequent failure point for players transitioning from college to the NFL due to faster defenders and complex protection schemes.
  • Mental reps and playbook assimilation: NFL playbooks can overwhelm new additions. Coaches weigh how quickly a player learns calls, protections, and adjustments.
  • Physical conditioning and durability: Adeniji’s college record shows availability. The Ravens will still test him for current conditioning and resilience through camp volume.
  • Special teams value: Can the player contribute in protection units? Coaches often favor players who multiply their roster value.

Live reps in preseason games are decisive. They give evaluators a game-speed view of technique, competitiveness and how a player responds when opponents exploit weaknesses.

Roster mechanics and financial considerations

Practical roster construction drives many late-summer moves. Understanding the nuts-and-bolts helps explain why the Ravens would bring in a veteran like Adeniji and still keep faith in a rookie like Pounds.

  • Contract cost: Veteran minimum deals and camp invites are low-risk financially. Bringing Adeniji in for a workout or a short-term camp deal costs the team limited cap space compared with guaranteed rookie money for higher draft picks.
  • Practice squad rules: Modern practice-squad eligibility is more flexible, allowing teams to stash veterans with experience. That creates a pathway for a team to sign a veteran as insurance without committing a 53-man roster spot immediately.
  • Versatility premium: A player who can occupy multiple spots—tackle and guard—effectively increases the number of unique positions a roster can cover. That versatility allows teams to keep fewer specialists and more multipurpose backups.
  • In-season roster churn: Teams often prefer to have veteran options available for mid-season additions, whether by signing free agents or elevating from the practice squad. Having a lineman on the practice squad or on a cheap vet-minimum contract eases midseason moves.
  • Special teams and developmental balance: Teams balance immediate special-teams contributions against developmental upside. A UDFA with high upside might be placed on the practice squad with the expectation of development, while a veteran more likely occupies an active roster spot for near-term insurance.

All these elements combine to create a financial and tactical calculus. Adeniji’s presence in camp maximizes flexibility: if he looks good, he can serve as a veteran backup or practice-squad insurance; if not, Pounds and other younger players retain their shots.

Comparative archetypes: how teams use veteran swing linemen

NFL teams routinely sign veteran linemen with journeyman backgrounds in late July and August. These players often:

  • Fill immediate depth holes from injuries or retirements.
  • Bridge a gap while young players acclimate to NFL speed.
  • Act as mentors to younger linemen, teaching pro techniques and work habits.
  • Provide security for a high-stakes quarterback by ensuring there’s an experienced hand available if a starter goes down.

The career arcs of established veterans demonstrate the value of this model. Players who show up with multiple team experiences often carry the intangible benefits of exposure to different schemes and coaching. Even if they don’t become long-term starters, their presence stabilizes the room and gives coaches confidence in rotating personnel.

For Baltimore, that type of veteran addition is a familiar and pragmatic path. The team’s front office values situational readiness and aims to keep players who will absorb pressure without collapsing the unit. Adeniji fits that mold: a player with starting tape who can be slotted into multiple positions as coaches see fit.

Decision scenarios: best- and worst-case outcomes for the Ravens’ line

The Adeniji workout and the Pounds signing set up a set of plausible outcomes that will shape Baltimore’s season.

Best-case scenario:

  • Adeniji demonstrates crisp technique during camp, shows quick adaptation to inside snaps, and earns a role as a swing tackle/backup guard. Pounds develops and makes the 53-man roster as a rotational reserve, providing the Ravens with two distinct types of depth—experienced and developmental. The team rides a deep offensive line into the season with the flexibility to weather injuries and maintain both run and pass balance for Lamar Jackson.

Mid-case scenario:

  • Adeniji shows limited upside compared to Pounds’s developmental potential. Coaches keep Pounds on the active roster and use Adeniji as practice-squad depth available for elevations when needed. The Ravens maintain coverage for their starters but may experience a short-term dip in cohesion if injuries arise early in the season.

Worst-case scenario:

  • Neither Adeniji nor Pounds proves reliable in camp. An injury to a starter forces Baltimore to scramble for external signings midseason, potentially settling for less suitable fits and jeopardizing offensive rhythm. This outcome exposes the broader risk of insufficient depth at tackle and guard.

These scenarios underline the need for decisive evaluation during July and August, when teams set the course for in-season availability.

Broader implications for Lamar Jackson and the offense

The depth of the offensive line directly affects the Ravens’ offensive identity. A stout, consistent front allows the team to commit to contested run plays, execute play-action sequences, and reduce the pressure on Lamar Jackson to extend plays with his legs. Conversely, a thin or inconsistent line forces a heavier reliance on quarterback improvisation and increases the chance of injury.

Ensuring that Jackson has reliable backups in front of him aligns with the long-term objective of sustaining peak performance across multiple seasons. Jackson’s style—the capacity to beat defenses with athleticism as well as arm talent—makes him particularly sensitive to the combination of pass-rush pressure and collapsed pockets. Depth accomplishes two things: it reduces the frequency of those pressure events, and it sets up contingency plans in case of injury, allowing the team to remain competitive without a catastrophic drop in offensive output.

The calculus extends to play-calling. With an offensive line capable of handling multiple fronts and rotating personnel without a steep performance drop-off, the Ravens can call plays that demand time in the pocket and complex blocking schemes. Without that buffer, coordinators must simplify protections, limit deep drops, and avoid matchup liabilities—constraints that reduce a team’s strategic flexibility.

Coaching development: turning potential into production

For Diego Pounds, the coaching staff’s ability to refine technique quickly will determine whether his raw traits translate into NFL snaps. Coaching staff emphasis typically includes:

  • Rep-focused corrections on hand placement and leverage.
  • Position-specific strength and conditioning programs to optimize anchor and lateral quickness.
  • Film study sessions geared toward identifying opponent tendencies and blitz pickup responsibilities.
  • Simulated rush packages that mimic likely game situations.

For Adeniji, the development path is shorter but still meaningful. Coaches will target cleaning footwork, minimizing wasted movement, and accelerating recognition of stunts and twists. Veterans can often make quicker gains because they’ve already internalized pro-level speed; the adjustments hinge on repetition and correcting old habits.

Effective development requires deliberate practice planning and a willingness to run reps at game speed in preseason contests. The staff’s capacity to provide both quality coaching and real-game reps will separate those who stick from those who become midseason reclamation projects.

Practical advice for fans watching the competition unfold

Fans evaluating Adeniji versus Pounds can focus on a few observable markers during preseason:

  • Consistency across days: practice flashes are good; daily consistency is better.
  • Snap-to-snap competitiveness: does the player finish the rep or give up after initial contact?
  • Adaptability: can the player maintain technique when asked to change position or assignment?
  • Special-teams snaps: is the player contributing on protection units and situational plays?

Preseason games provide high-value signals. Watch for which player the coaching staff trusts on third-and-long pass sets, or in short-yardage running downs. Those decision points reveal the staff’s confidence in a player’s ability to perform under pressure.

Final assessment: why Adeniji remains a sensible audition

Adeniji’s workout represents a prudent, low-risk strategy for the Ravens. He offers:

  • Immediate, documented experience in NFL games and starts.
  • Positional versatility that can ease the team through injuries.
  • A potential mentor presence for younger linemen moving into pro schemes.

At the same time, Diego Pounds personifies the modern team’s willingness to take low-cost swings at high-upside rookies. Pounds’ length and recent run to a CFP semifinal with Ole Miss project long-term potential if the coaching staff can smooth out technical inconsistencies.

The competition benefits the Ravens. In the worst-case scenario, the franchise must still potentially add outside pieces midseason. In the best case, a blend of Adeniji’s reliability and Pounds’ upside produces the depth the team needs to protect its franchise signal-caller and maintain offensive continuity throughout the season.

FAQ

Q: Who is Hakeem Adeniji and what does he bring to the Ravens? A: Hakeem Adeniji is a 6-foot-4, 302-pound offensive lineman who started 48 college games at Kansas and has appeared in 55 NFL games with 16 starts. He brings durability, tackle experience, and potential versatility to play inside. Coaches value his experience and the immediate depth he can provide as a swing tackle or guard.

Q: What is Diego Pounds’ background, and why is he competing with Adeniji? A: Diego Pounds is a 6-foot-6, 325-pound offensive tackle who played at North Carolina before transferring to Ole Miss, where he was part of the team that advanced to the College Football Playoff semifinals following the 2025 season. He went undrafted in 2026 but projects as a high-upside developmental player with strong size and pass-pro potential. Pounds’ upside and low financial cost make him an attractive competitor for a roster spot.

Q: Why are the Ravens focused on offensive-line depth now? A: The Ravens prioritize offensive-line depth to protect Lamar Jackson and sustain a balanced offense. Depth is necessary to absorb injuries, sustain run-game efficiency, and keep pass protection stable throughout a long season. Teams with mobile quarterbacks often need versatile backups who can be deployed across multiple positions without severe drop-off in performance.

Q: How do teams decide between signing a veteran like Adeniji or keeping a UDFA like Pounds? A: Decisions weigh immediate readiness against long-term upside, financial cost, special-teams contributions, and positional versatility. Veterans provide predictable, game-ready coverage; rookies offer developmental potential. Coaches’ evaluations during camp, preseason snaps, and how well each player fits scheme demands determine the final roster choice.

Q: Can Adeniji slide inside to play guard? A: Yes. Adeniji’s college and pro background suggests he could be asked to move inside. That conversion requires adjustments—interior play emphasizes quickness, hand technique and leverage. If coaches see him picking up those skills, he could be valuable as a guard or a swing interior/tackle option.

Q: What roster mechanisms allow the Ravens to keep both players? A: Teams can use the practice squad to retain developmental players while keeping veterans on the active roster or signing them to short-term deals. Expanded practice-squad rules make it easier to stash veterans as insurance without occupying a 53-man spot. Additionally, teams can sign veterans to low-cost, non-guaranteed deals to evaluate them in camp.

Q: How will preseason games affect the decision? A: Preseason games provide the most reliable, game-speed evaluations outside of regular-season action. Coaches watch consistency, technique under pressure, adaptability and special-teams contribution. Strong preseason performances by either Adeniji or Pounds will tilt roster decisions in their favor.

Q: If Adeniji doesn’t make the roster, could he return during the season? A: Yes. Veteran linemen often find roster opportunities during the season as injuries occur. A player who has worked with the team in camp will be more likely to be signed midseason because of familiarity with the playbook and staff.

Q: What should Ravens fans watch for in training camp? A: Track which players receive the most reps with the first and second units, who gets third-down and special-teams snaps, and how quickly each lineman absorbs coaching corrections. Pay attention to which players the staff defends publicly during pressers—that often signals trust. Lastly, preseason game performance will be the clearest indicator of who is likely to make the roster.

Q: Does Adeniji’s presence mean the Ravens lack confidence in their current starters? A: Not necessarily. Bringing in veterans for workouts is standard practice to assure depth and create competition. It reflects prudent roster management rather than lack of confidence. Competition often elevates the play of incumbents and prepares the roster for unplanned injuries.


The Adeniji workout is a small move with outsized meaning. It’s a sign the Ravens are methodically building insurance around their most important asset: a quarterback whose play style demands both protection and adaptability. Whether Adeniji becomes the veteran swing presence Baltimore needs or Pounds blossoms into the rookie the team hoped to snag, the end result should be clear—more options for a franchise that cannot afford to be thin along the offensive front.

RELATED ARTICLES